Thomas Stearns Eliot,
author of The Waste Land, has been called the most influential poet of the
twentieth century. He was born in St. Louis, Missouri, but became a British
subject in 1927. For this reason, his works may be studied in British or
American literature courses. In 1906 he attended Harvard, where he was
influenced by student groups who were interested in Elizabethan and Jacobean
literature, the humanism of Irving Babbitt, and Indian mystical philosophy. He
received additional education at the Sorbonne and at Oxford University. The
Waste Land first appeared in October, 1922, in the Criterion, a periodical
founded and edited by Eliot. In November of the same year it was published in
the Dial, an American publication. At a later date it was published as a book
with notes added, and it has also appeared in numerous anthologies. So, in this
assignment I will analysis the Waste Land poem.
The first section of The Waste Land (The
Burial of the Dead) takes its title from a line in the Anglican burial service.
It is made of four vignettes and each one of them seemingly from the
perspective of a different speaker. The first is an autobiographical snippet
from the childhood of an aristocratic woman, which she recalls sledding and
claims that she is German, not Russian. The woman mixes a meditation on the
seasons with remarks on the barren state of her current existence (“I read,
much of the night, and go south in the winter”). The second section is a
prophetic, apocalyptic invitation to journey into a desert waste, where the
speaker will show the reader something different from your shadow at morning
striding behind you or your shadow at evening rising to meet you. He will show you fear in a handful of dust
(Evelyn Waugh took the title for one of his best-known novels from these
lines). The almost threatening prophetic tone is mixed with childhood
reminiscences about a “hyacinth girl” and a nihilistic epiphany the speaker has
after an encounter with her. These recollections are filtered through
quotations from Wagner’s operatic version of Tristan und Isolde, an Arthurian
tale of adultery and loss. The third episode in this section describes an
imaginative tarot reading, in which some of the cards Eliot includes in the
reading are not part of an actual tarot deck. The final episode of the section
is the most surreal. The speaker walks through a London populated by ghosts of
the dead. He confronts a figure with whom he once fought in a battle that seems
to conflate the clashes of World War I with the Punic Wars between Rome and
Carthage (both futile and excessively destructive wars). The speaker asks the
ghostly figure, Stetson, about the fate of a corpse planted in his garden. The
episode concludes with a famous line from the preface to Baudelaire’s Fleurs du
Mal (an important collection of Symbolist poetry), accusing the reader of sharing
in the poet’s sins. The poet in lines 1-2 use personification in giving that
the ability to wake brilliance. In lines 4-5 he uses personification to give
inanimate object, the heart ability to remake peace. Also, in line 5, there is
imagery of (blaze), bright fire, radiating heat and crackling and popping,
creates a contrast to the serenity she had been describing.
The second section of
the Waste Land (A Game of Chess) takes its title from two plays by the early
17th-century playwright Thomas Middleton, in one of which the moves in a game
of chess refer to stages in a seduction. This section focuses on two opposing
scenes, the first one of high society and the second one of the lower classes.
The first half of the section describes a wealthy, highly groomed woman and her
around the exquisite furnishings. As she waits for a lover, her neurotic
thoughts become frantic, meaningless cries. Her day culminates with plans for
an excursion and a game of chess. The second part of this section shifts to a
London barroom, where two women discuss a third woman. (The bar is closing for the night) one of the
women recounts a conversation with their friend Lil, whose husband has just
been discharged from the army. She has chided Lil over her failure to get
herself some false teeth, telling her that her husband will seek out the
company of other women if she doesn’t improve her appearance. Lil claims that
the cause of her ravaged looks is the medication she took to induce an
abortion; having nearly died giving birth to her fifth child, she had refused
to have another, but her husband won’t leave her alone. The women leave the bar
to a chorus of good night. He use literary device in this section as in lines
(125) symbolize how modern souls have become hard and lifeless.
The third section of The
Waste Land( (The Fire Sermon) is taken from a sermon given by Buddha in
which he encourages his followers to give earthly passion (symbolized by fire)
and seek freedom from earthly things. In this section, as a series of
increasingly debased sexual encounters concludes with a river-song and a
religious incantation. The section opens with a desolate riverside scene about
Rats and garbage surround the speaker, who is fishing .The river-song begins in
this section, with the refrain from Spenser’s Prothalamion: “Sweet Thames, run
softly till I end my song.” A snippet from a vulgar soldier’s ballad follows,
then a reference back to Philomela (see the previous section). The speaker is
then propositioned by Mr. Eugenides, the one-eyed merchant of Madame
Sosostris’s tarot pack. Eugenides invites the speaker to go with him to a hotel
known as a meeting place for homosexual trysts. The speaker then notes himself to be Tiresias, a figure from
classical mythology who has both male and female features (“Old man with
wrinkled female breasts”) and is blind but can “see” into the future. The
speaker observes a young typist, at home for tea, who awaits her lover, a dull
and slightly arrogant clerk. The woman allows the clerk to have his way with
her, and he leaves victorious. Tiresias, who has “fore suffered all,” watches
the whole thing. After her lover’s departure, the typist thinks only that she’s
glad the encounter is done and over.
A brief interlude begins the river-song in earnest. First, a
fisherman’s bar is described, then a beautiful church interior, then the Thames
itself. These are among the few moments of tranquility in the poem, and they
seem to represent some sort of simpler alternative. The Thames-daughters, borrowed
from Spenser’s poem, chime in with a nonsense chorus (“Weialala leia / Wallala
leialala”). The scene shifts again, to Queen Elizabeth I in an amorous
encounter with the Earl of Leicester. The queen seems unmoved by her lover’s
declarations, and she thinks only of her.
The next section an abrupt end with a few lines from St. Augustine’s
Confessions and a vague reference to the Buddha’s Fire Sermon (“burning''). He use
literary device as water which is symbol to death or life.
As you can
see, The waste land poem is critique of
modern society. The main problems the modern world refer to the poem concern
the loss of meaning and faith. In this condition, people look for meaning in
the external and superficial. It explores this crisis in belief that pervaded twentieth
century western culture. Eliot endorse traditional values. He wants return to
religious values where individual live by their faith and this purportedly
gives meaning.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق